Skip to content

Report knocks 'fragmented' federal food-safety system

Fragmented oversight on food safety in the United States has allowed foodborne illness to persist as an expensive and all-too-frequent health concern, a new government report has found.

Why you can trust Investigate Midwest

Fragmented oversight on food safety in the United States has allowed foodborne illness to persist as an expensive and all-too-frequent health concern, a new government report has found.

The report — produced by the Government Accountability Office and released in January — determined that the several federal agencies charged with ensuring food safety often have redundant or confusing jurisdictions. Improvements in stopping foodborne illnesses have largely stalled as a result — and the number of reported multi-state outbreaks is on the rise.

Annually, one in six Americans are likely to get sick from something they ate, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Combined, those illnesses total more than $15.5 billion in expenses.

“Although the U.S. food supply is generally considered safe, foodborne illness remains a common, costly, yet largely preventable public health problem,” the GAO stated in its report.

Exactly 16 different agencies are charged with enforcing at least 30 different federal food-safety laws.

That list includes agencies in the departments of agriculture, commerce, health and human services, homeland security and transportation, among others. The complex framework means that it can be difficult to determine the agency with lawful regulatory authority, the GAO found.

For example, USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service inspects manufacturers that make packaged open-faced meat or poultry sandwiches. The FDA, in contrast, inspects manufacturers that produce more typical closed-faced packaged sandwiches. If manufacturers plan on exporting those close-faced sandwiches to Canada, however, jurisdiction might fall back to the USDA agency.

Similarly, one agency may regulate frozen cheese pizzas, while a second agency regulates frozen pizzas with meat, and a third agency regulates the ingredients included in both.

Day-to-day food-safety activities also trickle down to more than 3,000 nonfederal agencies.

To resolve this fragmentation — which has been criticized in federal reports several times in the past four decades — the Government Accountability Office recommended that the Executive Office of the President meet with key stakeholders and develop a cohesive national food-safety strategy to better guide oversight.

Food safety has been highlighted as one of the accountability office’s high-risk areas since 2007.


More in Health

See all

More from Robert Holly

See all

THANK YOU TO OUR FUNDERS

Reva & David Logan Foundation, Inasmuch Foundation, Lumpkin Family Foundation, Builders Vision Philanthropy, Gary Marx Journalism Fund, Kirkpatrick Foundation, Chicago Region Food System Fund, Illinois Food Movement Fund, GRACE Communications, Good Chaos, Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute, Fund for Investigative Journalism, Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting, Rural News Network, Google News Initiative, Data-Driven Reporting Project, Arnold Ventures.

We are proud to hold the Candid Seal of Transparency, demonstrating our commitment to openness and accountability in all that we do.

MEMBER OF